AI Readiness, Workflow & Knowledge Systems

Digital Tourism Think Tank

Digital Tourism Think Tank
Patterns across the submissions
A snapshot of the priorities surfaced in the pre-event Typeform, drawn from eight respondents. The Clinic will focus on the highest ranked themes.
Easy steps to help them implement this
Tools worth knowing
A working group with no pathway into the wider organisation creates a two-speed culture, with the gap between personal and organisational AI maturity widening the longer adoption stays contained.
- A working group with no pathway into the wider organisation creates a two-speed culture where a small group advances while everyone else stays still.
- The gap between personal and organisational AI maturity is already visible in your data and will widen if adoption stays contained.
- Destinations that embed AI across teams move faster and more consistently.
- Have you defined what the working group is responsible for delivering, or is it still exploratory?
- Has any of the group's work been tested with people outside it?
- Where has internal communication about AI worked and where has it been ignored?
- Is the blocker leadership confidence, time, the absence of a shared tool stack, or making AI feel relevant to people whose jobs look different from the working group's?
- Is there a tendency to wait for a finished strategy before sharing anything?
- Identify one person outside the working group whose job would benefit from one AI workflow and start there.
- Share one piece of working group output with a wider team, even informally.
A programme without a clear sequence draws strong engagement in the first session and diminishing returns after, so it needs a stable model the DMO can share and that outlasts the person who built it.
- A programme without a clear sequence tends to produce strong engagement in the first session and diminishing returns after that.
- Industry and partner enablement depends on the DMO having a stable and credible model to share.
- A well-structured programme creates replicable value, the difference between a project and something that outlasts the person who built it.
- How far have you got with defining the structure of your programme and where does it feel least resolved?
- Have you shared a draft or early version with any partners or industry contacts and what came back?
- Where does the programme feel strongest and where does the ambition outrun delivery capacity?
- Is it scope, resource, getting the right organisations to commit as participants, or designing something that works for destinations at every level of AI maturity?
- Is there a risk the programme tries to do too much before any part of it has been tested?
- Define what success looks like at the end of the first phase only.
- Identify one destination or partner to run the first session with as a live test before building further.
Partners who cannot reach destination knowledge on their own keep returning to the DMO for answers that could be self-served, while AI built on well-structured knowledge lets industry find answers and self-assess.
- Partners who cannot access destination knowledge on their own keep returning to the DMO for things that could be self-served, which is costly at any scale.
- AI tools built on well-structured destination knowledge let industry find answers, check information and self-assess in ways that were not practical before.
- Destinations that help their ecosystem work more effectively position themselves as infrastructure.
- Is your destination knowledge organised in a way an AI tool could draw on reliably?
- Have you piloted any partner-facing tools or knowledge resources, even at a basic level?
- What do your partners ask for most often and does that knowledge exist somewhere structured and findable?
- Is the blocker the state of the knowledge itself, the technical build, the resource to maintain it, or uncertainty about whether partners would use it?
- Is there a governance question about what knowledge should be open to partners and what should not?
- List the ten questions your partners ask most often and check whether the answers exist in a structured, accessible form anywhere in your organisation.
- Test whether those answers could be fed into an existing tool without a custom build.
Most DMOs hold significant destination data but the way it is structured, stored and made accessible varies enormously across organisations and scales. Establishing shared standards that work for a national body and a small local operator at the same time is one of the most consequential infrastructure decisions the sector is facing.
- AI systems surface destinations whose data is structured, clean and machine-readable. Inconsistent or poorly formatted data across the ecosystem creates visibility gaps that no amount of content production will fix.
- National data standards create a shared foundation that smaller operators can build on rather than each solving the same technical problem independently.
- The investment required to get this right is significant and the case for it needs to be made to leadership in terms they find compelling.
- Is there any existing data standard or taxonomy your organisation uses and how consistently is it applied across partners?
- Have you attempted to audit how your destination data is currently structured and where the gaps in machine-readability are?
- Has the conversation with senior leadership about data infrastructure investment happened and if so how was it received?
- Is the challenge technical, financial, political or a combination of all three?
- Is there a risk that different bodies attempt to set their own standards independently, creating fragmentation rather than consistency?
- Identify one existing data standard in adjacent sectors or from a leading DMO and assess whether it could serve as a starting point rather than building from scratch.
- Document one concrete example of where poor data structure has directly affected your destination's AI visibility and use it as the opening case for the leadership conversation.
Thank you.
The one theme that surfaced across all four challenges.
The smallest action you can take back to your organisation this week.
The mistake most organisations make with this topic.